Well, the art form of the novel allows distort historical reality, to fill the voids and the missing links of the imagination, to give the desired events and characters the author focus and tilt. Why not? Its hand - the lord. The artist - not a chronicler, not a chronicler. He creates his own world - these and interesting. If the interest generated by them mir.A. Parvus Unlike Voronel A. I do not think the image of the writer Parvus creative success. Does this character down from heaven or from hell to raise, but his figure is no life. The author apparently feels it, because it tries to ground, giving, for example, the "elephant-begemotnoy" appearance, gluttony, but such trappings grounded not save. The image is not filled with flesh and swells like a soap bubble. Parvus novel devoid of taste, color and smell, as distilled water; weightless and amorphous, like a cloud in trousers. Not a feather of Ivan Denisovich created! It's more like a pen of Sergei Nilus, makes up for the lack of literary gifts prophecies about the imminent arrival of the Antichrist, who is trying to intimidate readers, but only frightened himself. Novel Parvus - is not a person, not a character, and the personification of a boring world Jewish conspiracy.